Incineration

Municipal Trash Incinerators in Upstate NY (Google Maps)

These incinerators are sorted by their size, with the largest ones up top, and smallest ones below. These numbers are converted from the yearly numbers of the DEC, to average tons per day, as calculated in standard format for landfills (21-day months).

Incinerators normally are rated by 31-day months, as they typically burn trash year round, unlike landfills which are closed on Sundays and all Major Holidays, and also work only half days on Saturdays. For the sake of comparison, 31-day incinerator tonnages where converted to 21-day landfill tonnages. Tonnages can vary per day, as incinerators are not rated on the tonnage of waste they may accept, but how many BTUs of energy are produced by burning the waste. Incinerators burning larger volumes highly combustable wastes, such as tires or roofing material, must reduce their tonnage to comply with air quality permits.

Incinerated waste produces bottom (unburnable stuff) and fly ash (toxic by-products of combustion captured in various smoke stack filters), which must be disposed at a landfill, so for example, the 1,266 tons per day incinerator in Ondononga County still produces an average of 316 tons per day of ash that is currently sent to the Seneca Falls Landfill off of NY 414.

Also, it should be noted the minimal electricity protection of these facilities. The largest incinerator in Upstate NY, produces only 67 MW of electricity, compared to even modest new power plants such as the new 635 MW Besicorp Natural Gas Plant in Rennselear or the 750 MW Bethlehem Steam Station Natural Gas Plant in Glenmont. All of the incinerators in Upstate NY, produce far less electricity (124 MW) then this one power plant.

Niagara Falls.


View Larger Map

MSW Processed: 3,869 tpd – Ash Generated: 906 tpd – Reduction in Tonnage: 24% – Average Electricity Sold: 24 MW/hr + steam

Westchester County.


View Larger Map

MSW Processed: 2,778 tpd – Ash Generated: 665 tpd – Reduction in Tonnage: 24% – Average Electricity Sold: 67 MW/hr

Onondaga County.


View Larger Map

MSW Processed: 1,266 tpd – Ash Generated: 316 tpd – Reduction in Tonnage: 25% – Average Electricity Sold: 23 MW/hr

Hudson Falls.


View Larger Map

MSW Processed: 688 tpd – Ash Generated: 215 tpd – Reduction in Tonnage: 31% – Average Electricity Sold: 10 MW/hr

Dutchess County.


View Larger Map

MSW Processed: 599 tpd – Ash Generated: 177 tpd – Reduction in Tonnage: 30% – Average Electricity Sold: 5 MW/hr

Oswego County.


View Larger Map

MSW Processed: 290 tpd – Ash Generated: 87 tpd – Reduction in Tonnage: 36% – Average Electricity Sold: 0.6 MW/hr + stream

Waste-to-Energy Plants Keep Trash From Mounting. So Why Are Environmentalists Against Them? – VICE

Waste-to-Energy Plants Keep Trash From Mounting. So Why Are Environmentalists Against Them? – VICE

This is exactly what environmentalists are afraid of.

"The government has to encourage people to produce more waste,” Ymata said, adding that the government may allow the importation of waste from other countries just to provide continuous waste feedstock for these WTE facilities.

“[I]t's like a can of worm[s],” he said. “When you start allowing it, there will be...other problem[s] that will surface along the way."

ALBANY

NEW YORK: ALBANY. 10 YEAR OLD STATE-OWNED RDF INCINERATOR SLATED TO BE SHUT DOWN.

When Albany’s incinerator went on line in 1982 it was state-of-the-art. It was designed to burn 600 tpd -but was only able to burn 400 tpd- and is located next to the State capitol buildings, in downtown Albany. Aside from a 10 year history of supplying the area with excessive particulate emissions, the incinerator supplies heat and air conditioning to NY State’s office buildings. According to Judy Enck of the New York Public Interest Research Group this plant has several unique features. 1. It is owned and operated by the State of New York. The state has determined that this notoriously poorly run incinerator (operated by the State!) would need millions of dollars for a retrofit to meet federal air emission standards by 1995, and instead of retrofitting, they have decided to stop burning garbage in the incinerator before February 1995 and, instead, burn a cleaner fuel in the facility: natural gas. 2. A sweetheart contract between the city of Albany and NY State was signed in 1982. (The project was “conceived” by Erastus Corning II, who had served as Mayor of Albany for 40 years -the longest tenured Mayor in America.) The city of Albany gets paid by the State for the garbage it delivers to the incinerator (which includes municipal waste from 14 other communities). The city of Albany receives approximately $10 million a year for delivering garbage to the state-run incinerator and for disposing of the ash! The State owns and operates the RDF incinerator and the shredding operation (which is located “far from habitation” at the Rapp Road landfill site in Albany) and the city owns the landfill. The ash is landfilled at the unlined Rapp Road landfill, which has no leachate collection, located in the middle of the Albany Pine Bush -an ecological pristine area that is home to the Karner blue butterfly, which is soon expected to enter the endangered species list. The city got an expansion to the landfill, and now they want to sell the landfill to a private company. 2. The incinerator has seldom, if ever, been in compliance with its permit conditions for particulate emissions. Pollution controls: a 3-field electrostatic precipitator (ESP). Thomas Jorling, Commissioner of the NY Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC), lives within 500 feet of this incinerator, and has stated on several occasions that this incinerator is “abysmal.” The incinerator is operated by New York Office of General Services. 3. The incinerator was cited in 1991 by the NY-based INFORM group for emitting the highest levels of dioxins and furans out of 7 incinerators they had data on – 188 times the state-of-the-art standard on dioxin of 0.10 nanograms per dry normal cubic meter. Albany measured 18.8 ng/dry normal cubic meter. Of the 7 incinerators INFORM reported on, the Albany plant had the highest furnace temperature, 2500°F, and the highest dioxin emissions. (Reference: Burning Garbage in the US: Practice vs. State of the Art, published in 1991 by INFORM, 381 Park Avenue South, NY, NY 10016. Tel: 212-689-4040.) 4. The RDF operation has suffered more than 32 explosions in the last few years. The shredding plant was designed by Smith & Mahoney of Albany. (The boilers were built by Zurn Industries.) 5. In 1986 Dr. Daniel Wartenburg, then with the Harvard School of Public Health, concluded that the plant’s chromium and nickel emissions could cause a significant increase in cancer cases among people living near the plant. Wartenburg calculated a lifetime cancer risk from NY DEC test results of ambient air emissions for chromium and nickel: up to 3,000 cancers per million from the chromium emissions and 300 cancers per million from the nickel emissions. The response of the state was not to shut down the incinerator, but rather to study where the chromium was coming from. Though we never found out where the chromium was coming from, one explanation given was that the chromium might be from from the shredding operation of the garbage to make the refuse derived fuel. According to a report in the Albany Times Union of 11-13-86: “…the equipment used to shred the trash is made of a steel alloy which has a high chromium content. The plant has two shredders, each of which consists of 16 steel hammers. Those hammers periodically wear out…about 1,000 pounds of steel from the hammers decompose into the garbage each month. For the past several years the plant has been using replacement hammers which…contain relatively high amounts of chromium. Although most of the chromium is bonded into the steel alloy, the report states that chromium which is not ‘fixed’ into the steel makes up 2.17 percent of the weight. That would mean that of the 1,000 pounds of steel wearing off the hammers each month, nearly 22 pounds would be chromium…As the shredders wear out, they have to go in and weld on what they call ‘buildup’ onto the walls and the rotors…It has a high chromium and high nickel content. We used about 100 pounds of that a month. Over the past six years, I’d say we used at least 5,000 pounds of weld wire…” 6. Dangerously elevated lead levels have been detected in children who lived near the plant and a lawsuit is under consideration. Of 9 incinerators that INFORM had data on, the Albany incinerator had the highest lead emissions. 7. NY State and Albany have put out bids to sell the incinerator operations, which include the RDF incinerator, the shredding operation and the city owned landfill. 17 companies have responded to the request for bids, including BFI & Wheelabrator. For more information contact Judy Enck at NYPIRG’s Albany office: Tel: 518-436-0876.

Source: http://www.americanhealthstudies.org/wastenot/wn191.htm

Hudson Valley Incinerator One of Top Polluters in U.S.

Report: Hudson Valley Incinerator One of Top Polluters in U.S.

A new report ranked a Hudson Valley incinerator as one of the top polluters in the U.S., which can significantly threaten our health. Download the Hudson Valley Post App According to the Tishman Environment and Design Center at The New School in New York City, 4.4 million people in the U.S. are exposed to pollution from waste incinerators. -advertisement- The waste incinerators reportedly emit mercury, lead, particulate matter 2.5 and 10, sulfur dioxide, nitrous oxide, and carbon monoxide, all of which can pose significant dangers to public health.

Environmental and community groups detail opposition to proposed Catskill incinerator ash dump

Environmental and community groups detail opposition to proposed Catskill incinerator ash dump

Wheelabrator Technologies, the second largest trash incineration company in the U.S., has proposed creating a large incinerator ash dump in a former quarry in the Town of Catskill near the shore of the Hudson River. The company is in the process of applying for permits from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.

This project would involve trucking approximately 445,000 tons of toxic ash on local roads โ€” including U.S. Route 9W โ€” through Catskill and surrounding communities, with trucks coming from the south and the north. The quarry site is made up of highly permeable hydrology, which is known to have extensive drainage systems and springs, adding to the likelihood of toxic ash reaching the Hudson River and groundwater. Incinerator ash like that from Wheelabrator incinerators includes high levels of heavy metals and dioxins. The ash poses a significant risk to the surrounding regionโ€™s human and natural communities as well as to the entire Hudson River ecosystem.

Corporations Buying Liberal Opinion-makers on Garbage Incineration

It bothers me that the Center for American Progress is taking money from Covanta incinerator corporation toย promote garbage incineration on their blog

Puerto Ricans will soon be turning their trash into renewable energy. On Tuesday, the Environmental Protection Agencyย announcedย its final approval of an air permit for a 77 megawatt EfW plant, owned by Energy Answers International, a first for the U.S. island territory.Theย $650 million facility, which will be built in three years in the town of Arecibo, will create thousands of direct and indirect induced jobs, and turn more than 2,100 tons of garbage a day into renewable electricity for more than 76,000 homes on the island.

Creating domestic renewable energy is a major necessity since Puerto Ricoโ€™sย electricityย is overwhelmingly derived from imported petroleum, natural gas, and coal.Six public hearing sessions were held since May 2012, and over 3,000 public comments had beenย reviewedย by the EPA. And while the comment period is open for this issued permit, Energy Answers has gone through a long and rigorous review process and there should be no objections that delay the project from moving forward.Here are five reasons why energy from waste is a great opportunity for Puerto Rico and the rest of the United States.

incineratorDec2010b

Here is an article explainingย why many environmentalists think this is a terrible idea

Environmental, community and medical group leaders charged Tuesday that actions by the Fortuรฑo administration demonstrate that incineration is the official public policy for solid waste, rather than working toward a goal of โ€œzero garbage.โ€

The government has orders to shut down the islandโ€™s landfills within the next 36 months, and proposals to build incinerators in Arecibo and Barceloneta, Sierra Club members said during a press conference at the Puerto Rico Bar Association, in Miramar, Tuesday.

โ€œIncinerating our trash is not the solution, because a third of each ton of trash that is set on fire becomes highly toxic ashes, and winds up in landfills,โ€ Biaggi said, adding government’s goal should be to reduce, reuse and recycle our solid waste.

According to Biaggi, Puerto Rico should be able to take care of 67 percent of its solid waste, while supposedly generating thousands of related jobs.

The reality is most progressive cities are able to recycle upwards of 90% of their waste through convenient recycling programs, that don’t lock up recycling bins or make them hard to access. Likewise, progressive cities ban styrofoam from vendors, and have separate bins soiled paper, food scraps, and yard waste for composting.

Many cities on the west coast have adopted Zero Waste policies and have seen dramatic reductions in the amount of waste going to landfills, by diverting technical materials like plastic and glass to recycling, and organics to composting facilities. Unfortunately, many of the east coast cities have fallen behind on their material recovery efforts.

More about Zero Waste.