Trump’s pro-bono deals with law firms are confusing

How can a law firm agree to represent a client pro-bono on behest of an agreement with the US President against the the government itself? It seems like ripe conflict of interest to have a private law firm representing a private individual against the government on behest of the government.

While there is some history of the government supporting not-for-profits that advance the private interests against the government – such as legal aid services for the poor or utility intervenors – it’s seems like Trump’s agreement with certain law firms is much more specific on who will be helped under these agreements. When the government is actively supporting private parties against itself – rather broad classes of people needing justice – it seems confusing at best and a worse a conflict of interest.

The government should be fighting for the public interest, and if a policy is contrary to public interest then the government should not be perusing it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *