June 21, 2018 10:45 pm Update

One thing I always find fascinating about ordering parts from China is how often packaging and correspondence includes pictures of flowers, flowery artwork and how products are branded like “Strive to have a good day” or “Be lucky and gratitude given”, or “Lucky Products, Inc”. Almost to an American a feminine characteristic to it. There is something kind of mystical and earthy about Chinese culture.

June 21, 2018 9:58 pm Update

After an hour and a half hiking in the Pine Bush without a flashlight, I’m standing on Overlook Dune at 10 pm at night, bathing in moonlight looking down at millions of fireflies. Despite being less than five miles from the state capitol building, I’ve not seen a single person on the trail.

June 21, 2018 8:59 pm Update

After listening to Lynne Lynne Jackson presentation on the history of Save the Pine Bush at Albany Pine Bush Commission World Headquarters out for a hike on the first night of summer. Ruby red skies tons of fire flies.

New York state public-benefit corporations

New York state public-benefit corporations

"Public benefit corporations in New York State have origins in mercantile capitalism. A shared tradition of English common law and Dutch law may explain their origins. The New York Court of Appeals provided a thorough history of state laws regarding public authorities in the 1994 case Schulz v. State, 84 N.Y.2d 231. As the court explained, state debt limits were first enacted as a reaction to fiscal crises caused by the state's lending of its credit to "irresponsible" canal and railroad corporations in the early nineteenth century. The state was forced to assume these obligations, which amounted to more than three-fifths of the state's entire debt. In 1846, a referendum requirement was added to the state constitution, prohibiting the state from contracting long term debt without approval by the voters."

"As early as 1851, the legislature began to search for ways to evade the constitutional debt limit in order to finance public works projects. Canal certificates, which would be repaid through canal revenues, and which by their terms were not state obligations, were nevertheless held to be unconstitutional in Newell v. People, 7 N.Y. 9 (1852). The court held that the state had a moral obligation to repay the debts if canal revenues proved insufficient, and thus the certificates were deemed "an evasion if not a direct violation of the constitution". In 1921, the legislature chartered the first state public authority, the Port of New York Authority, as a new vehicle for financing public projects while insulating the state from long term debt obligations. In 1926, the Court of Appeals held in Williamsburgh Savings Bank v. State, 243 N.Y. 231, that the state could disclaim any moral obligation for public authority debts. However, amendments to the 1938 Constitution overruled this case and completely disclaimed the state's responsibility for any public authority debt."

"The widespread use of public authorities in New York State was pioneered by Robert Moses in the 1950s and 60s. Much of Moses' power base resulted from his tight control of the Triborough Bridge Authority, which allowed him to earmark revenues from tolls on the bridge for other projects in New York City and around the state. He also served as president of the Jones Beach Parkway Authority (1933–1963), president of the Bethpage State Park Authority (1933–1963), and chairman of the New York Power Authority (1954–1962). Moses, through his control of these authorities, was able to build some of New York's most important public works projects, including the Cross-Bronx Expressway, the Brooklyn-Queens Expressway, and various bridges and parkways. The public authority model allowed Moses to bypass many of the legal restrictions placed on state agencies, allowing him to expedite development but also allowing him to hide project financing, contracting and operational information from public scrutiny. Because of this, he has been criticized for wasteful spending, patronage, and refusing to consider public opposition to his projects."

How toxic is dry cleaning?

How toxic is dry cleaning?

"The problem with traditional dry cleaning is a liquid solvent called "perc," short for perchloroethylene. (Despite the moniker, dry cleaning isn't really dry; it just doesn't involve water.) Perc is what dissolves the gunk off of your clothes. It's highly effective without being labor-intensive andβ€”unlike the cleaning chemicals of oldβ€”it's not likely to burst into flames. That's why cleaners have been using it for the past 50 years."

"People have been concerned about the chemical's health risks since the 1970s. Perchloroethylene (also known as tetrachloroethylene) is considered a toxic air pollutant by the EPA, meaning that it's "known or suspected to cause cancer or other serious health effects." Short, intense blasts of perc can cause dizziness, headaches, or loss of consciousness. But how dangerous is long-term exposure? Indoor and outdoor air usually contains a few micrograms of perc per cubic meter. At those background levels, the New York State Department of Health estimates that there's a theoretical risk of up to five additional people in 1 million developing cancer after a lifetime of exposure. (Some agencies have calculated slightly higher risks; California's Air Resources Board, for example, estimates an additional six to 30 cases of cancer at those background levels.)"