Energy

Show Only ...
Maps - Photos - Videos

Has There Been A β€œNuclear Incident” In The Arctic?

Has There Been A β€œNuclear Incident” In The Arctic?

"Thhere have been rumblings regarding some sort of nuclear incidentβ€”or possibly incidentsβ€”in the Arctic over the last month. Multiple reports, some of them from official monitoring organizations, have reported iodine 131β€”a radioactive isotope often associated with nuclear fissionβ€”has been detected via air sampling stations throughout the region."

There are diseases hidden in ice, and they are waking up

BBC: There are diseases hidden in ice, and they are waking up

"However, what would happen if we were suddenly exposed to deadly bacteria and viruses that have been absent for thousands of years, or that we have never met before? We may be about to find out. Climate change is melting permafrost soils that have been frozen for thousands of years, and as the soils melt they are releasing ancient viruses and bacteria that, having lain dormant, are springing back to life."

Don't worry, be happy !

What If Climate Scientists Are Guessing Wrong?

What If Climate Scientists Are Guessing Wrong?

"There is, they reckon, about a 10 percent chance of a temperature increase exceeding 6 degrees Celsius, or 11 degrees Fahrenheit. That would be a civilizational catastrophe, orders of magnitude more dangerous than the likely warming scenarios, and potentially on a scale that could threaten human life. Even if the likely scenarios were completely harmless, the far-right tail alone is horrific enough to justify significant steps. After all, they argue, people do not accept a 10 percent likelihood of a fatal car crash or terrorist attack. Wagner and Weitzman are economists well versed in climate science who bolster their case with a rigorous analysis of both science and probability."

Climate of Complete Certainty

Climate of Complete Certainty

"Let me put it another way. Claiming total certainty about the science traduces the spirit of science and creates openings for doubt whenever a climate claim proves wrong. Demanding abrupt and expensive changes in public policy raises fair questions about ideological intentions. Censoriously asserting one’s moral superiority and treating skeptics as imbeciles and deplorables wins few converts.

None of this is to deny climate change or the possible severity of its consequences. But ordinary citizens also have a right to be skeptical of an overweening scientism. They know β€” as all environmentalists should β€” that history is littered with the human wreckage of scientific errors married to political power."