Save the Pine Bush

Save the Pine Bush is a not-for-profit community group which came into being on February 6, 1978. Its mission is to stop development of the Albany Pine Bush in the Capital District of the U.S. state of New York.

http://www.savethepinebush.org/

Second lawsuit filed over Guilderland Planning Board’s approval of Pyramid project | The Altamont Enterprise

Second lawsuit filed over Guilderland Planning Board’s approval of Pyramid project | The Altamont Enterprise

GUILDERLAND — A week after a judge in Albany County Supreme Court ruled in favor of a group of Westmere residents and a Guilderland gas-station owner who were seeking to stop construction of a 222-unit development on Rapp Road and proposed Costco Wholesale store, a not-for-profit organization has filed a lawsuit over the same projects.

Save the Pine Bush is bringing the suit based on the Guilderland Planning Board’s August adoption of the findings statement for Pyramid’s Rapp Road and Western Avenue projects, as well as the October site-plan approval given to the company’s apartment and townhome development — an approval that was given based on the findings statement.

Costco, at what cost? – Albany Times Union, 11/25/2020

Costco, at what cost? – Albany Times Union, 11/25/2020

State Supreme Court Justice Peter Lynch was unsparing when he ruled last week that the environmental review of apartments and a Costco store proposed for Guilderland was far from thorough.

Judge Lynch, in a highly detailed 77-page ruling on a lawsuit brought by town residents, knocked the developer, Pyramid Management Group, for keeping its plans for the massive new development a secret, and criticized the Guilderland Town Planning Board for cutting corners as it undertook the state Environmental Quality Review Act process

Judge denies development of new Guilderland Costco and Rapp Rd. apartments | WNYT.com

Judge denies development of new Guilderland Costco and Rapp Rd. apartments | WNYT.com

An Albany Court Judge rules the challenged approvals of a future Costco near Crossgates Mall and the development of more than 200 apartments on nearby Rapp Road “arbitrary and capricious, null and void.”

Save the Pine Bush and the Guilderland Coalition for Responsible Growth says they’re pleased to announce this court victory against the Guilderland Planning Board.

Guilderland’s Environmental Approval for Costco and Rapp Road Site Plan Approval for Apartments in the Pine Bush Ruled Null and VoidοΏ½by Supreme Court Justice Peter Lynch | Guilderland Coalition for ResponsibleοΏ½Growth

Press Release: Guilderland’s Environmental Approval for Costco and Rapp Road Site Plan Approval for Apartments in the Pine Bush Ruled Null and VoidοΏ½by Supreme Court Justice Peter Lynch | Guilderland Coalition for ResponsibleοΏ½Growth

Save the Pine Bush and the Guilderland Coalition for Responsible Growth are pleased to announce a court victory against the Town of Guilderland Planning Board. Supreme Court Justice Peter Lynch stated in his decision that the Town of Guilderland Planning Board’s SEQRA process for the Rapp Road Residential/Western Avenue Mixed Use Redevelopment Projects “violated SEQRA procedure and the ‘hard look’ test, rendering the . . . approvals arbitrary and capricious, null and void.”

The 77-page decision meticulously reviewed the entire State Environmental Quality Review (SEQRA) that the Town of Guilderland Planning Board applied to this project proposed by Rapp Road Development, LLC (aka Pyramid). Throughout the decision, the judge noted the many places where the actions of the Board were “arbitrary and capricious” and did not take the SEQRA required “hard look” at the proposed project. 

The criticism began almost immediately, with the decision stating “On scrutiny, the record herein is replete with conclusory self-serving and equally troubling representations made by the project sponsor [Pyramid], without the support of empirical data, which, unfortunately, the Planning Board relied on. That is not the stuff that the SEQRA hard look test is made of.” [emphasis added]

The decision noted in great detail how the project would harm the Rapp Road Historic District and the Westmere Terrace neighborhood. Several times, the decision observed that the project sponsor merely stating that their proposed project was allowed by the zoning, that did not constitute a “hard look.”

The lawsuit was brought by four residents of the Westmere neighborhood and Red-Kap sales.