Criminal Justice

The Plymouth Mail Truck Robbery β€” Timothy J. Baker

The Plymouth Mail Truck Robbery β€” Timothy J. Baker

On August 14, 1962, a man in a police uniform stopped a mail truck headed for the Federal Reserve Bank in Boston. What the postal worker behind the wheel didn’t know was that the officer was an imposter, the truck was filled with $1.5 million and the largest cash heist in history up to that point was underway.

Brandishing guns, the “policeman” and another man wearing civilian clothing stormed the truck, which had just left tourist-laden Cape Cod. The thieves forced the mail employees out of the truck and onto the highway, where they were bound and gagged. They then threw their captives into the back of the truck and took off.

According to the employees, the hijackers, who called each other “Buster” and “Tony,” stopped twice to unload cash before dumping the truck and the people inside just outside Boston, some 60 miles from Plymouth, Massachusetts, where the robbery occurred. By the time the hostages escaped, Buster and Tony had already made their getaway.

Because of the carefully chosen location of the heist, there were no witnesses. A 15-foot-high median strip prevented southbound motorists from spotting the suspicious happenings in the northbound lanes, where the truck was stopped. Buster and Tony—or their accomplices—placed stolen detour signs about four miles south of the truck to reroute traffic behind them.

HISTORIC 1962 HEIST STILL UNSOLVED – capecodtimes.com

HISTORIC 1962 HEIST STILL UNSOLVED – capecodtimes.com

PLYMOUTH -- Forty years after a mail truck was robbed of more than $1.5 million in one of the largest holdups in state history, the crime remains unsolved.

Authorities think as many as five men and one woman were involved in the robbery on Route — in Plymouth, which netted $1,551,277, about $300,000 more than the more famous 1950 Brinks robbery in Boston. But the only two people ever brought to trial were found innocent, and the money was never recovered.

Did Cellphones Bring Down Crime Rates in the ’90s? – The Atlantic

Did Cellphones Bring Down Crime Rates in the ’90s? – The Atlantic

The intriguing new theory suggests that the arrival of mobile phones made holding territory less important, which reduced intergang conflict and lowered profits from drug sales. Lena Edlund, a Columbia University economist, and Cecilia Machado, of the Getulio Vargas Foundation, lay out the data in a new National Bureau of Economic Research working paper. They estimate that the diffusion of phones could explain 19 to 29 percent of the decline in homicides seen from 1990 to 2000.

“The cellphones changed how drugs were dealt,” Edlund told me. In the ’80s, turf-based drug sales generated violence as gangs attacked and defended territory, and also allowed those who controlled the block to keep profits high. The cellphone broke the link, the paper claims, between turf and selling drugs. “It’s not that people don’t sell or do drugs anymore,” Edlund explained to me, “but the relationship between that and violence is different.”

It's often underestimated how much technology changed that ways of human relationships, and while I doubt cellphones entirely drove the drop in crime over the past two decades, all the evidence suggests that crime has dropped due to many different factors.

Fear-based social media Nextdoor, Citizen, Amazon’s Neighbors is getting more popular – Vox

Fear-based social media Nextdoor, Citizen, Amazon’s Neighbors is getting more popular – Vox

Violent crime in the US is at its lowest rate in decades. But you wouldn’t know that from a crop of increasingly popular social media apps that are forming around crime.

Apps like Nextdoor, Citizen, and Amazon Ring’s Neighbors — all of which allow users to view local crime in real time and discuss it with people nearby — are some of the most downloaded social and news apps in the US, according to rankings from the App Store and Google Play.