One of the things that bothers me is that many people insist police protection services should be free to use.ย ๐ฎ There is a cost to using to government services, and one when voluntarily calls the police, they should be charged for the cost of the service — to discourage over use of the service. A $300 fee to file a police report makes a lot of sense — it’s the same fee you would pay to get access to the civil courts.ย ๐ This fee would do a lot to discourage mass filers of criminal complaints — like at Walmart and other big-box stores.
If you are a victim of a crime then it makes sense to pay the proposed $300 fee for filing a police report. Crime is expensive to it’s victims — especially when you figure the cost of hospital bills for injuries and loss of use of stolen or damaged property. ๐จ It’s also expensive to local government to investigate and punish. If you are harmed by a criminal, it’s worthwhile to pay the $300 fee to get justice. After paying for the police report, you can ask a court for reimbursement for your losses, after the perpetrator of the crime is successfully convicted.โ
There is the thought that poor people might be less likely to report crime, if they knew they would have to pay $300 to the local police department to have their report of crime investigated.ย ๐ But actually that’s the idea — to reduce police utilization, you have to charge people for filing a police report. You could also set up not-for-profits that could assist impoverished people in covering police filing fees. This would ensure even poor people have access to police services.๐ฐ
Too often people are abusing “free” police services, getting the state involved when they could find their own solutions to problems impacting their lives.