Climate Change 📍

🖼️ Photos 📽️ Videos

Democrats Pledge to Fight Trump’s Termination of Ocean Monitoring Observatories – The New York Times

Democrats Pledge to Fight Trump’s Termination of Ocean Monitoring Observatories – The New York Times

Democrats said Tuesday they intend to fight the Trump administration’s plan to eradicate a deep-ocean observation system critical to understanding climate change and marine ecosystems. The system cost $368 million when it was installed in 2016 but now officials want to shut it down, which they say would save $48 million in operating costs each year. The National Science Foundation declined to say how much it would cost to remove more than 900 remote ocean instruments that are anchored to the ocean bottom in far-flung locations, including in the Atlantic and Pacific oceans and an area between Greenland and Iceland known as the Irminger Sea. The agency will begin sending ships to begin pulling up the instruments later this month, a process that is expected to take about 15 months. The ocean observation system was designed to operate for at least 25 years, meaning the decision would result in the loss of more than a decade of data.

A sweltering start to summer in Europe

An exceptionally early and historic spring heatwave 😅 is currently breaking decades-old temperature records across Western Europe. The unseasonable weather pattern began in late May, bringing mid-summer heatwaves weeks ahead of schedule and creating severe health and infrastructure challenges across the continent.

Meteorologists attribute this extreme event to a robust heat dome. 🌞 This meteorological phenomenon occurs when a high-pressure system traps hot air traveling up from Northern Africa. Acting like a lid on a pot, the system compresses the air down toward the surface, continuously heating the land while blocking cloud formation and rainfall. Countries across Western Europe are registering temperatures 20 to 30 degrees Fahrenheit above average for May. 🌡

  • United Kingdom: London’s Kew Gardens recorded 94.6°F, shattering the country’s previous May record by a staggering 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit. The UK also registered rare “tropical nights,” where overnight temperatures remained above 68°F.
  • France: The country experienced its hottest May day on record. Paris crossed 86°F for the first time this year, while Hossegor in the southwest hit a record-breaking 96.8°F.
  • Spain & Portugal: Temperatures in Seville climbed to 100.4°F over the weekend, with some areas in the Iberian Peninsula braced to approach or exceed 104°F as the week progresses.
  • Other Regions: Germany crossed the 86°F mark prematurely, and Ireland and Hungary (Budapest hitting 90°F) logged unseasonably severe highs.

The sudden spike has caught many nations off guard, as infrastructure in Northern and Western Europe is traditionally built to retain heat rather than deflect it. 🏭

  • Fatalities: At least seven heat-related deaths have been confirmed in France, including multiple accidental drownings as citizens flock to unmonitored beaches and rivers before lifeguards are stationed for the summer season. In the UK, at least nine deaths have prompted urgent water-safety warnings.
  • Work Restrictions: Regions in Italy have introduced mandatory restrictions on outdoor physical labor during peak heat hours.
  • Transit Disruptions: London commuters have faced severe delays due to a lack of air conditioning in subway lines and reports of smoke on the train tracks caused by overheating.
  • Energy Sector: While clear skies have generated record-high solar power, the stalling air under the heat dome has caused wind power generation to plummet to fractions of its typical output.

The United Nations climate chief, Simon Stiell, called this early heatwave a “brutal reminder of the spiraling impacts of the climate crisis”. 🌍 Climate scientists note that Europe is currently the fastest-warming continent on Earth, heating up at roughly double the global average. Human-driven global warming has “loaded the dice,” making atmospheric blocking events like heat domes significantly more intense, longer-lasting, and prone to arriving much earlier in the spring.

Map: Hartland Swamp Wildlife Management Area
Map: Hill Higher State Forest

The interesting discussion I got into the other day about climate change 🌎

The other day I was in an interesting discussion about climate change. It was kind of interesting in the sense that it came with a fundamental misunderstanding of how I see the problem and how it relate to the solutions towards it. Often people who are concerned about climate change, mostly see the problem in a collective sense, or one of personal guilt, rather then a personal risk — something to be prepared for and take steps to prevent oneself from becoming a victim of it in the future.

There is a popular trend in the liberal ideology to feel a lot of guilt about the world today. To be concerned about the hungry starving children in India, the poor people loosing their homes and all their belongings to wildlife or floods. People who have a lot less then they do, who ultimately fell into their misfortune by no fault of their own. Some people truly do have bad luck, but also some people bring upon their bad luck by making bad decisions and not being prepared for likely scenarios of the future.

Every other day when I open up Facebook and the Youtube, I see another one of these so-called sustainable investment opportunities and technologies. Endless advertisements for heat pumps, solar panels, renewable energy schemes (SHOUTING GIRL IN YOUTUBE AD: get solar power, now without panels on your roof !!!), electric cars, recycling, organic and vegan food, and endless investment opportunities in sustainable funds. Because if you have money, you can buy your way out of your guilt. Or so we are told by the advertisers, pushing endless amounts of plastic, aluminum, not-so-green chemicals, and electronics upon us. No need to give up the suburbanite way of living, as long as you pay for your sins. I often see these sustainable ads, and have to wonder what Martin Luther would have said about them?

All the evidence suggests that climate change is a big problem that is going to be solved by government action, not individual choices. Buying the right kind of car or properly cleaning out your salad dressing bottle and recycling it isn’t going to stop the planet from getting warmer. Investing in the latest green energy scheme might feel good, but there is no guarantee it will be profitable or even have much of an effect on the warming planet. Feel good actions are nice, but they aren’t really significant if they don’t lead to political change. There is an important place for political activism, and it’s wonderful that some people step up to do it — but political activism shouldn’t cover for personal failings.

My view on climate change is pretty darn simple — it’s going to happen and going to be real bad, especially if politicians fail to enact policies that are dramatic enough to arrest it. There is a lot of denial, especially in “greenie” circles that climate change won’t happen, especially if you buy the right products. Not the big jacked up truck I have, or the fact that I don’t clean out plastic bottles before chucking them in the fire. In this discussion I was having, it was pointed that if I move out to country, with my hobby farm, driving my big jacked-up truck back and forth to the city, my carbon footprint will increase, as will the impacts on the land by farming and living on it compared to my small apartment in city, where I can ride the bus to work, walk to a lot of destinations, and it’s a short drive to the store.

But if you believe that climate change is going to bad, and is almost inevitable as politicians don’t want to enact unpopular policies to slow it, then you have to take a different tack at the problem — namely, taking action to protect oneself from the worse impacts of climate change.

That means first and foremost saving and investing, so you have a liquid asset that can be a means to purchase necessities to survive when shit hits the fan, which is almost inevitable. It also means having land where I can produce a lot of my own food, and an off-grid system that isn’t dependent on a power grid that is likely to have a lot of problems in the future as storms become more severe, more areas flood and trees come down. Where power plants struggle with extreme heat and a wildly fluxing gulf stream. Where civil disorder becomes more common in cities, as people bake and traditional institutions fall. When driveway and roads washouts become more common, and need to be fixed by the farm tractor regularly.

It’s a scary world ahead, and I don’t think I can change it, but I can be prepared for what is going to happen. I can live with less, live simply, and reduce my impacts without buying into all these greenie crap that the marketers are constantly bombarding us with advertising on.

Thematic Map: Troy vs Manhattan - A Size Comparison
Terrain Map: How does the area of Manhattan (rotated) compare to Moose River Plains Camping Area?