There are just so many options and itβs difficult to decide! I really donβt want to take the advice of just what a bike shop says, as maybe their advice is in my best interest, maybe itβs not β and more likely Iβm just not describing what I actually want as I might not know. Iβm now leaning towards the Trek FX 2 over the Trek Dual Sport 2.
A few days back I was all about the Trek Dual Sport 2 over the FX 2. Not because I was a fan of the suspension β I really wasnβt, as itβs just something to break and lower-cost bicycles with suspensions are crap that wear out relatively quickly. Indeed, thatβs the major issue with my 2004 Gary Fisher Nirvana and why the shop tells me itβs not worth rebuilding. But I really liked how I could run wider tires on Dual Sport 2, and it has more aggressive traction on the default tires then FX 2.
But maybe thatβs not really needed, as itβs rare the roads I ride arenβt asphalt or hard-packed dirt. Do think Iβll have bad traction? My real concern is that I will get flat tires on the dirt roads I will sometimes ride. The FX 2 has TPI 30 tires vs 60 TPI tires which with half the threads does mean theyβre more prone to punctures. But by how much? And itβs not like I canβt upgrade to more puncture resistant higher TPI tires and tubes later on if itβs a problem.
And, big heavier tires are no guarantee you wonβt get flats. Trust me I know, I put a nail through the 35 inch tires on my big jacked up truck. Those BFGs are crap tires even if they look super cool. And you run over a pallet nail you are going to have a flat regardless. The differences in tire size are relatively small β FX 2 runs 700c x 35 while the Dual Sport 2 runs 700c x 44 and my old Gary Fisher Nirvana runs 700c x 42.
Iβve already decided I am not looking to do mountain bike trail riding, I am quite happy to park my bicycle at the trail head and walk back. Most of the places I go are covered with plenty of automobile roads, and my purpose for having a bicycle is to traverse boring automobile roads or rail trails quicker than a walk. At some point I may want to get a mountain bike, but a mountain bike is going to be a complete slow, heavy pig anywhere on road. A good bicycle shouldnβt kill you to move it down the road.
I need to remind myself β hunting rabbits with a 30-06 might be fun but you wonβt have much meat if any left to eat. The 35s on my big jacked up truck might be fun, but I also have a V-8 to turn them. And Iβve come to the conclusion that my next truck will likely not he full sized or jacked up most likely. Full size trucks are a bitch on the trail, especially if you have to back up or are trying to get into a tiny campsite. Plus with the lift kit, Iβm always afraid to abuse the truck too much in fear Iβll break shit.
The truth is that Iβm thinking the FX 2 bike is the way to go. Itβs the much more efficient to ride and doesnβt have the problematic front suspension that I donβt want. If I want to run a somewhat wider tire in the future, it can run 700c x 38 with a more aggressive tread. But that might not fix my fear of flats, if it becomes a problem they also make bicycle tubes that resist puncture. Tubes and tires arenβt real expensive for bicycles to replace or upgrade, theyβre not like the 35 inch tires on my truck. Both bikes run the same size and type of wheels though the FX 2 has limited tube clearance. Both bikes use the same wheels, so spoke breakage risk the is same, but as long as I run the tires hard and donβt abuse the bike too much I should be good. The bicycle is rated 300 lb rider and gear.
The dual sport cycle as they say is the worse of both worlds. My fear is that it also would encourage me to abuse it with its roll confusion. A dual sport cycle is not a mountain bike. Iβm sure thatβs part of the reason I trashed the wheel on my Gary Fisher hybrid in college. It seemed like too much of a mountain bike but really shouldnβt have been allowed to stray too far from public roads made of dirt, packed gravel or asphalt. I feel that with the FX 2, without the suspension, more aggressive wider tires and tread pattern Iβm much less likely to abuse.