Second crude oil train safety check finds minor problems
But what happens when people aren't watching so carefully when these trains become the norm?
Why ads? π€ / Privacy Policy π³
But what happens when people aren't watching so carefully when these trains become the norm?
It looks like the state is getting tough on the crude oil trains going through our city.
Last night’s presentation by Chris Amato at the Save the Pine Bush dinner got me thinking ….
The crude oil issue in Albany and along the Hudson Valley is a difficult one for many individuals who think deeply about it. Obviously, having a light crude supply for our east coast refineries in like the Baaken Shale oil is an important one when it comes to having affordable energy in the east coast. On the other hand, we can only imagine the disaster it would be to have one of those many oil trains roll over along the Hudson River.
They are moving more and more crude out of the Albany Port. Once a major oil importation port that supplied most of Upstate New York and New England with quality refined oil products, now a lot of the flow has been reversed to bring light crude oil out from the Baaken Shale to load onto ships and bring to east coast refineries.
As a whole, light crude isnβt that bad if itβs spilled. Itβs the stuff they produce in the Southern Tier of New York and Pennsylvania in limited quantities. Cleaning it up is more like cleaning up used motor oil then a heavy nasty crude like tar sands oil. But all oil is toxic, smothers plants and animals, and ultimately rots aways with a high nutrient content that depletes the oxygen in the water.
Now, Albany is faced with increased crude oil transport. If anything increases risks, itβs the practice of expanding the amount of material β as you running against the law of large numbers. The increased crude oil flowing through the port also means there will be more traffic, more risk of collisions, and mistakes as people rush to get the oil from one place to another. Light crude oil explodes and burns relatively easily, as itβs closer to gasoline then tar.
There is also the issue of the steam plant that Global Partners LLP wants to build to allow the use of heated railcars as the port, for unloading heavier crudes. Many are concerned that this proposal will bring in tar sands oil to the port. Even if itβs just pumped, heavy Alberta crude, and not the tar sands, this heavy oil is problematic. Heavy crude might not flow very far at normal temperatures, but it will certainly sink and coat the river bottom and get spread around the river bottom.
The crude oil issue is not my personal issue. Save the Pine Bush is the main issue I am involved in these days, especially as work seems to consume so much of my time and emotional energy. But I think itβs a good thing that people are out there championing policies that will help protect our communities and our river.
There are many things one has to be concerned with proposals to increase crude oil transport in Albany.
Every time you drive by the port, it seems like there is more and more crude oil tankers.
Darn.... And the press release I wrote on Friday afternoon said there had been only "three" near misses with crude trains in NY State in past year. Now it's four.
This is fascinating as many decrepit structures are.
United States oil consumption in 2012 will be about 4.7 million barrels a day, or 20%, lower than it would have been, if the pre-2005 trend in oil consumption growth of 1.5% per year had continued. This drop in consumption is no doubt related to a rise in oil prices starting about 2004.
via Why is US Oil Consumption Lower? Better Gasoline Mileage? | Our Finite World.