Politics

Blowing Up the Government

I was listening to Preet Barhara’s podcast the other day, and one of his conclusions was the dangerous nature of so many Americans wanting to “blow the system up” as their reason for voting for President Trump. Indeed, I consider myself one of the people who supports blowing up the system and I thought about voting for Trump, although ultimately ended up voting for Jill Stein in 2016 and Larry Sharpe in 2018.

As Preet Barhara notes, Donald Trump would be a dangerous demagogue if not for the fact that he is clumsy with his power, giving the other power brokers in Washington DC a lot of power to corral the bull in the China shop. Trump says outrageous things on Twitter, but the political institution mostly keep moving on the same direction as they always have. Government is big, slow and bureaucratic, which is both it’s greatest strength and weakness. Institutions and the people who make them up, can always play the waiting game, while politicians have to move fast to get anything done.

Why do so many of us want to blow up our government, voting for dangerous candidates? For one, the revolutionary, independent spirit is in our DNA. Americans have endowed rights in the constitution, one of them is to reject our leaders and institutions when we don’t like what they do. We believe in the absolute to right to criticize our leaders, we believe in the rights of private of citizens to own firearms and defend their homes. We believe government should largely remain out of our business and off our land, except when the most limited of regulation is necessary to protect the public good.

For too many of us, we think the government has gotten too bureucratic, too interested in protecting itself, long established institutions and corporation, and the powerful donors, rather then average people. While life is improving for most Americans, we feel like government still doesn’t care for us, that the interest of the government put ahead of individual. As Phil Ochs once sung, “Tell the Cops About Your Rights as They Drag You to the Ground” Elected officials who blow things up can be agents of change, at least they will break up the established order. We don’t want fascism or expansion of the government state into our lives, but we do want government to better address the big problems society faces and protect individuals from the excesses of large corporations and those who seek to play on unfair.

1964 Lyndon Johnson Ad – Saw off the East Coast.

Many Democrats accused Barry Goldwater of not being a citizen because he was born in Arizona Territory, before it became a state. Questions also surrounded George Romney, who was born in Mexico to parents who are moved there to escape the US restrictions on polygamy.

US Military Occupations Supported By Far More Democrats Than Republicans

New Poll: US Military Occupations Supported By Far More Democrats Than Republicans

"This didn’t happen by itself, and it didn’t happen by accident. American liberals didn’t just spontaneously start thinking endless military occupations of sovereign nations is a great idea yesterday, nor have they always been so unquestioningly supportive of the agendas of the US war machine. No, Democrats support the unconscionable bloodbaths that their government is inflicting around the world because they have been deliberately, methodically paced into that belief structure by an intensive mass media propaganda campaign."

An interesting question I’ve not discussed in the press is what would happen during an extended government shutdown when it comes to rent payments and utility bills.

An interesting question I’ve not discussed in the press is what would happen during an extended government shutdown when it comes to rent payments and utility bills. Could a government agency be evicted from its building by the landlord? The federal government rents a lot of buildings from private landlords. Figuring rental contracts and evictions are regulated under state law it gets even more complicated. I would imagine that under the US Constitution such a case would end up in federal court. Likewise, I could see a utility shutting off power to a government building if utility payments aren’t made.

I’m guessing what would happen first is a bunch of aggrieved landlords and other parties would go to a federal district court and make the argument that the federal government is obligated to pay due Article XIV of the constitution and the court would appoint a special master to review bills that the government is obligated to pay and then pay them regardless of the action of congress and the president. I could also see essential furloughed employees approaching a federal court and making the argument that they are subject to involuntary servitude, especially if they are subject to criminal sanctions for walking off the job during the furlough.

Brace Mountain