Government

China Raises Threat of Rare-Earths Cutoff to U.S. – Foreign Policy

China Raises Threat of Rare-Earths Cutoff to U.S. – Foreign Policy

With a simple visit to an obscure factory on Monday, Chinese President Xi Jinping has raised the specter that China could potentially cut off supplies of critical materials needed by huge swaths of the U.S. economy, underscoring growing concerns that large-scale economic integration is boomeranging and becoming a geopolitical weapon.

With the U.S.-China trade war intensifying, Chinese state media last week began floating the idea of banning exports of rare-earth elements to the United States, one of several possible Chinese responses to U.S. President Donald Trump’s decision to jack up tariffs on hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of Chinese goods and blacklist telecoms maker Huawei.

I think trade wars are a bad idea, as we should be bringing the world together for our collective good, rather then tearing it apart. While the United States, over time could find alternatives to imported rare earths, including more domestic mining and alternative product formulations, it could be unneccessarily harmful in the short-term for both the United States and China. It's no different then the OPEC trade embargo in the 1970s -- it was very harmful in the short-term, although in the long-term increased domestic production and fuel economy standards helped dull the pain, as did a loosening of the embargo.

NPR

China Trade Talks Shaped By President Trump’s Divided Advisers : NPR

President Trump escalated the trade fight with China this week, saying he will steeply increase tariffs on Chinese products this Friday.

But while the White House projects a unified front in favor of wielding tariffs as a weapon against China, it wasn't always this way.

Early in Trump's presidency, close advisers fought bitterly over whether tariffs would help β€” or devastate β€” the U.S. economy, those advisers told NPR and the PBS show Frontline.

The Taking Down the Great Replacement

Back when I was in college, one of the reading assignments for a Political Philosophy class I took was to read Timothy McVeigh’s Essay on Hypocrisy. While many of his things were non-sensible or disagreeable, it’s interesting to learn about the ideas behind important people whose actions — rightly or wrongly have a significant consequence on our lives both for better or worse.

I was disappointed to find out that many websites have taken down Brenton Tarrant’s The Great Replacement manifesto, because some find it racist and offensive. It is, but it’s also important for people to understand the ideas behind people who have an impact on our community and lives, for good or for bad. Like it or not — terrorists are some of the most important people in our world today — they force governments and private entities to invest millions in security and deterrence and force private citizens to be inconvenienced by such security measures.

Information can help people make better ideas and choices. It’s worthwhile to consider even racist and arguably bad ideas, because they can help us make better ideas. Understanding where terrorists come from doesn’t recruit or validate their action, but it can make for a more thoughtful and inclusive society, that can work to bring people on the outside back in.

Disclose Expected Government Killing

They should require all government programs to come with a disclaimer on how many human lives they are expected to take and by what methods.

For example, setting speed limits or regulations on consumer products. How many lives will be taken, how many will be saved? Or the impact of increased or decreased law enforcement. How many lives are increases to law enforcement expected to save, how many will take, justifiable or otherwise? How many lives will be taken by the repeal of the American Healthcare Act? How many lives will end because of the tax policy?

Every decision by government leads to the taking of a certain number of human lives, but it should be a good public policy to control the amount of life taken by government to force government to justify it’s killing.