The Misguided Attacks on ACLU for Defending Neo-Nazisβ Free Speech Rights in Charlottesville
The Misguided Attacks on ACLU for Defending Neo-Nazisβ Free Speech Rights in Charlottesville
"Last week, the ACLU sparked controversy when it announced that it was defending the free speech rights of βalt-rightβ activist Milo Yiannopoulos after the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority refused to allow ads for his book to be displayed on public transit. Lost in the debate was that other groups the ACLU was defending along with Yiannopoulos were also censored under the same rule: Carafem, which helps women access birth control and medical abortion; the animal rights group PETA; and the ACLU itself."
"For representing Yiannopoulos, the civil liberties group was widely accused of defending and enabling fascism. But the ACLU wasnβt βdefending Yiannopoulosβ as much as it was opposing a rule that allows state censorship of any controversial political messages the state wishes to suppress: a rule that is often applied to groups which are supported by many who attacked the ACLU here."
"The same formula was applied yesterday when people learned that the ACLU of Virginia had represented the white supremacist protesters in Charlottesville after city officials tried to ban the group from gathering in Emancipation Park where a statue of Robert E. Lee was to be removed (city officials tried to move the march to an isolated location one mile away)."
"One board member of the ACLU of Virginia, Waldo Jaquith, waited until the violence erupted to announce on Twitter that he was resigning in protest of the ACLUβs representation of the protesters β as though he was unaware when he joined the board that the ACLU has been representing the free speech rights of neo-Nazis and other white supremacist groups (along with communists, Muslims, war protesters, and the full spectrum of marginalized minorities and leftists) for many decades."