What’s for dinner? Or how English makes for unhealthy eating π½
It might sound strange to inform dinner guests that the main components of the meal will consist of sweet corn, peppers, onions, zucchini, and chopped apples, accompanied by chicken and brown rice.
English has transitioned from a time of nutritional deficiencies to a focus on protein as the primary element of a meal, encouraging people to concentrate on and consume the most protein during dinner. Nonetheless, nutrition experts emphasize that vegetables should constitute the larger portion of any meal, comprising at least one-third, if not more, of your plate. The combination of fruits and vegetables should encompass half to two-thirds of your meal. Protein sources such as meat and fish, as well as whole grain carbohydrates, should constitute less than a quarter of your meal.
One reason for meat being considered the central element rather than a side dish might be due to the time required for its preparation. Many types of meat demand an extended cooking period involving cutting, seasoning, baking, or grilling. On the contrary, what are often referred to as “sides,” particularly fresh vegetables, necessitate minimal cooking. It seems counterintuitive to make the less labor-intensive portion of the meal the focal point.
However, it might be more logical to reframe the approach to eating around the sides, rather than the conventional centerpiece. Encouraging discussions around healthy plates could lead to a more nutritious diet. For instance, envisioning a meal as sweet corn, peppers, and broccoli with a side of steak or hamburger might be beneficial. This approach could guide individuals to establish appropriate portion sizes and prioritize their meal components. While the term used for the evening meal might seem insignificant, it can profoundly impact one’s perspective.