Government

Americaโ€™s highest court needs term limits

Americaโ€™s highest court needs term limits

"A more workable change would be to appoint justices for single 18-year termsโ€”staggered, so that each president gets two appointments per termโ€”rather than for life. Each presidential term would thus leave an equal mark on the court, and no single justice would remain on the bench for 30 or 40 years. New blood would make the court more vital and dynamic. A poll taken in July showed widespread bipartisan support for term limits. So long as former justices were prevented from standing for office, becoming lobbyists or lawyers after stepping down from the court, this would be an improvement."

Ruth Bader Ginsburgโ€™s health and the case for Supreme Court term limits

Ruth Bader Ginsburgโ€™s health and the case for Supreme Court term limits

"The core problem here is the stakes of Supreme Court nominations: Theyโ€™re too damn high. Candidates serve for life โ€” which, given modern longevity and youthful nominees, can now mean 40 years of decisions โ€” and no one knows when the next seat will open. President Jimmy Carter served four years and saw no open seats. President George H.W. Bush served four years and filled two. Barack Obama served two terms and confirmed two justices. Donald Trump isnโ€™t even two years into his presidency and, thanks to McConnellโ€™s assist with Merrick Garland, heโ€™s already filled the same number of vacancies as Obama did in eight. The result isnโ€™t merely an undemocratic branch of government but a randomly undemocratic branch of government. And that randomness, and the stakes of seeing it play out in your sideโ€™s favor, turn Supreme Court nominations into bloodsport."