The other day I was talking with this guy who kept complaining about my use of the word redneck to describe good ol’ boy, hard-working, living off-the-land country people. He kept correcting me, saying the term redneck was patently offensive, in essence a “white nigger”, leaving aside the fact that some African Americans have adopted their own use of the word “nigger”. I’ve always though obscenity was kind of silly, as words only have as much meaning as you give them.
If you want to call yourself something offensive, is it offensive?
The best way to take a bite off obscenity is to use a word casually, like has long been common with the word “fuck”, in the sense of saying, that’s “really fucked up”. And indeed, a lot of rural people have long adopted the word redneck, not as an obscenity but a symbol of pride — self-reliance, hard working, not afraid of mud or muck. Not the backwards, racist meaning some give it.
I like the term redneck, as I think it describes a good lifestyle, one that is largely self-reliant and sustainable. One that isn’t based around high consumption, but making the best of the natural and mechanical resources available to you. Rednecks are often highly skilled in mechanical and natural systems, a point that is often ignored by the popular press. There is a lot of skill and knowledge that goes into farming and homesteading, to say nothing about mechanics. Just because a fix isn’t pretty, doesn’t mean it’s not real or effective.
I don’t buy that idea that calling somebody a redneck is a hate term, especially if they are more then willing to adopt the term. I don’t think the redneck lifestyle is pejorative or bad, indeed I would argue it’s good as it’s often more sustainable then the high-consumption lifestyle of the suburbanite — and closer to the land and realities of natural world. Sure, in the suburbs you have your soy-milk in your disposable plastic container, and maybe it looks good on a per-capita basis, but it’s not as real or close to the environment as a dairy goat or pig you’ve slaughtered yourself.
I don’t think calling a redneck a rural person has the same effect. There are plenty of yuppies and gentrified folk in Columbia County who raise sheep or horses. But they aren’t the same as the trailer-living, wrenching their own cars, pig-raising, hard-working country boys who live a life of mud and muck and grease, and aren’t such a distance from the land the live on.
Propane is widely sold as a cleaner and cheaper fuel to heating oil, especially in rural Western NY in areas lacking natural gas lines. Oil still remains dominant though in rural parts around the Hudson Valley. I don’t know if electricity is that much of a threat to propane, although it’s obvious that propane dealers see the writing on the wall, or at least are pretty fearful about heat pumps and greater electrification of rural residences. A farm or rual residence might be a good place for solar panels, and if you can make your own energy, why pay a propane dealer?
I have some experience working with propane having used it a fair bit for camping over the past six and half years with a twenty gallon tank and my big buddy heater, propane stove and lantern. Propane has its pros and cons for sure — it’s a relatively clean fuel but it can get very dirty from the oils on connectors taking them in and apart in the woods. But certainly propane is a much cleaner and more reliable fuel then the awful liquid gas stoves I used to use, especially when burning regular gasoline.
When I own my own land and have an off-grid cabin, I will probably use propane but I’m not sure if I would want to use it as a primary heating fuel, as it’s relatively expensive and makes you dependent on propane deliveries, which can be difficult if not impossible in remote country. Plus it sure seems l like some of the propane dealers engage in scammy business models. While bulk propane delivery is much cheaper, getting a 100 lb or even a 30 lb tank might be a better option, as you can take it to any propane filler to get filled and have multiple tanks around.
Most energy consumed by propane is by far for heating. While I might keep a propane wall heater or a big buddy heater for warming things up quickly in the cabin when things are cold, I think the best method of heating remains wood, harvested and processed yourself. Wood is a carbon neutral fuel if harvested from your own acreage, it’s not dependent on market prices. Propane though is good for cooking, although if you have a wood-stove going, you might as well make breakfast and other meals in a cast iron skillet right on the wood-stove, rather then consuming expensive gas.
In the summer, an outdoors cook-stove might be a good option, although in my experience in Boy Scouts, cooking on wood isn’t as easy as you might think to control heat levels, and it’s a lot of waiting for coals to build up. Maybe though in a regular outdoor cook-stove it’s easier to cook then an smokey, open fire. At least with a cook-stove you can ventilate the smoke up and above and not have it in your face, and to boot, papers and wrappers can be disposed of after cooking so you have less kitchen trash around. But I don’t know, there is definitely some advantages to cooking with gas, especially in rural areas without access to high-voltage electricity.
Truck yeah or something like that … this video is surprisingly interested and insightful but maybe it’s how I like this girl thinks about how shitty things have gotten in America.
