🗺️ Maps 🖼️ Photos 📽️ Videos

Opinion | Iran Is Trolling Us and We’re Not Doing Anything About It – The New York Times

|

Opinion | Iran Is Trolling Us and We’re Not Doing Anything About It – The New York Times

Since the Iran war began, Iranian officials and pro-Iran influencers have used A.I.-generated content like this — clever, highly shareable, fluent in pop culture references (Lego, Marvel, Forrest Gump) — to ridicule the United States or present Iran sympathetically.

The strategy has been effective in its reach. In the first 50 days of the conflict, official Iranian accounts on X earned roughly 900 million views and 22 million likes — more than 30 times their previous 50-day totals for likes, according to a recent analysis. During the same period, shares of content on these accounts rose from 4.3 million to 76 million. Many other Lego-style videos have gone viral, too, garnering tens of thousands of likes and millions of views on Instagram, TikTok and X.

Magnifica Humanitas 

|

Magnifica Humanitas (“Magnificent Humanity”) is the landmark first social encyclical of Pope Leo XIV, published on May 25, 2026. Signed on May 15 to coincide with the 135th anniversary of Pope Leo XIII’s seminal labor encyclical Rerum Novarum, the 42,300-word document updates Catholic social teaching for the digital era. Just as Leo XIII addressed the challenges of the Industrial Revolution, Leo XIV tackles the moral, anthropological, and structural shifts caused by Artificial Intelligence.

While I am not a particularly religious person and certainly not a Catholic, I think he makes some important points that are summarized below and worth reviewing. Obviously, also consider the source document and the Pope’s own words, but this is a useful summary to explain his line of moral thinking about the advancement of technology. I share many of his concerns, especially around centralized technology, and the decisions made by a few elites in our country for good or for bad.

The full text of the encyclical can be found on The Holy See Official Website. The official summary and presentation transcripts are available via Vatican News. 

1. Central Premise: The Choice Between Babel and Jerusalem 

Pope Leo XIV opens the five-chapter encyclical by framing the AI era through two biblical images: the Tower of Babel and the rebuilding of Jerusalem. 

  • The “Babel Syndrome”: The Pope warns against a self-sufficient technocratic paradigm that reduces the human person to mere data and performance while prioritizing profit over the weak.
  • Technology is Not Inherently Evil: The document states that technology is not inherently antagonistic to humanity. However, because technology takes on the moral characteristics of those who design and finance it, it is never neutral. 

2. The Urgent Call to “Disarm AI”

A core pillar of the encyclical is the demand that AI be “disarmed” from the logics of military, economic, and cognitive domination. 

  • Rejecting Technocracy: Technical power does not automatically confer the right to govern.
  • Critique of Transhumanism: The text strongly rejects transhumanist views that treat human limitations as defects. The Pope asserts that human fragility and finitude are vital dimensions where relationships and openness to God mature.
  • No Autonomous Lethal Force: The Pope declares it “not permissible” to entrust irreversible, life-and-death decisions to autonomous weapons systems. 

3. Labor Rights and “New Forms of Slavery”

Directly channeling Rerum Novarum, the Pope exposes the hidden human cost behind high-tech supply chains. 

  • Supply Chain Exploitation: He forcefully condemns the dangerous conditions endured by workers and children extracting “rare earth elements” needed to power digital infrastructure. He calls the physical toll on these workers a “new form of slavery”.
  • Digital Colonialism: The Pope denounces how corporate entities turn intimate demographic and health data into commodities, turning the digital layer into a “space of exploitation”.
  • A Historical Apology: In a historic moment within the text, the Pope asks for forgiveness for the historical delays with which the Church historically condemned transatlantic slavery. 

4. Shared Ethics and Robust Regulation

Pope Leo XIV insists that an ethical framework for AI cannot be left to a small circle of Silicon Valley executives or wealthy nations. 

  • Universal Destination of Algorithms: Expanding on traditional Catholic teaching regarding shared natural resources, the Pope argues that algorithms, platforms, and data repositories should be managed as a common or shared good.
  • Slowing Down for Justice: He calls on political leaders to enact robust legal frameworks and independent oversight, asserting that “slowing things down” to ensure community participation is an act of responsible care, not a rejection of progress. 

5. Impact on Education, Youth, and Truth

The document flags the deep psychological and social risks of an unguided digital transformation. 

  • Erosion of Truth: AI-generated misinformation and algorithmic biases erode public trust, which the Pope warns can lead toward totalitarianism.
  • Protection of the Young: The Pope highlights the dangers of premature smartphone ownership, warning that affectionate chatbots could become “hidden architects of our emotions” and isolate children from genuine human relationships.
  • Reforming Education: Educational models must move away from information fragmentation and instead reincorporate silence, in-depth reading, and rigorous analysis to foster true wisdom. 

The Path Forward

The encyclical concludes with a call to action for all individuals to become “artisans of hope“. Quoting J.R.R. Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings, the Pope reminds the global community that it is not our part to master all the tides of the world, but to do what is within our power to uproot evil in the fields we know. He challenges humanity to build a “civilization of love” through small, steadfast acts of daily fidelity to protect human dignity. 

Map: Mountain House Trail and North Mountain
Thematic Map: Albany Art

Read Bird Enemies by John Burroughs | 25,629 Free Classic Stories and Poems | FullReads

|

Read Bird Enemies by John Burroughs | 25,629 Free Classic Stories and Poems | FullReads

How surely the birds know their enemies! See how the wrens and robins and bluebirds pursue and scold the cat, while they take little or no notice of the dog! Even the swallow will fight the cat, and, relying too confidently upon its powers of flight, sometimes swoops down so near to its enemy that it is caught by a sudden stroke of the cat’s paw. The only case I know of in which our small birds fail to recognize their enemy is furnished by the shrike; apparently the little birds do not know that this modest-colored bird is an assassin. At least, I have never seen them scold or molest him, or utter any outcries at his presence, as they usually do at birds of prey. Probably it is because the shrike is a rare visitant, and is not found in this part of the country during the nesting season of our songsters.

Sue to settle and plea bargins

|

There has been a lot of talk lately about President Trump settling a lawsuit with his own government. He had sued for $10 billion over the release of his tax returns, and the government in exchange for the President dropping the law suit promised in contract to set up to a $1.776 billion fund to pay out to other victims of the Weaponization of Government.

Besides the obvious conflict of interest, out of court settlements and plea bargains both end investigation and court review. Whether or not the people who are getting paid out are legitimate victims of Weaponization of Government, the public will never know. Their names and taxpayer funds allocated may be released, however the legitimacy of their claims will never be fully investigated. And those who engaged in weaponization of government will never be held accountable.

Plea bargains, pleas, and out of court settlement shortcut justice. They say it’s not worthwhile to waste finate government resources, or drag victims or even perpetrators through a long unnecessary court process when everybody is in agreeemnt on a remedy. But it also short-circuits public knowledge of what actually happened or the investigation of a judge or jury into the facts. And that is problematic in my mind.