Role of Law 📍

If American Democracy Collapsed, You Almost Certainly Wouldn’t Notice It

If American Democracy Collapsed, You Almost Certainly Wouldn’t Notice It

Working from these two points—democracy is a pattern of behavior, and laws only constrain if people behave as if they are constrained—it follows that we would be correct to say that democracy has collapsed if the explicit or implicit patterns of behavior that govern access to political authority no longer operated. And we would not look to the passage of a law, or necessarily even the outcome of an election, to determine if democracy had collapsed.

emocracy, in fact, makes it particularly challenging to know if democracy has collapsed. That is because when democracy functions, challenges to it are usually hidden, and when they emerge in the open, they are processed through a system that presumes that challenges can be handled democratically. Political actors invoke laws and Constitutions as if they were binding constraints. Stresses that pose questions about the stability of the regime over time, therefore, are fundamentally ambiguous. They may be regime-altering, or not. And the responses to them by those who hold power may be regime-altering. Or not.

And that is why, if American democracy were to collapse, you almost certainly wouldn’t notice it. Not right away, at least.

Dimitri Tsafendas – Exposing a Great Lie in South African History – ROAPE

Dimitri Tsafendas – Exposing a Great Lie in South African History – ROAPE

In the South African House of Assembly, on 6 September 1966, Dimitri Tsafendas knifed to death Prime Minister Hendrik Verwoerd. Shortly after, Tsafendas was declared to be a schizophrenic who had no political motive for assassinating Verwoerd. Declared unfit to stand trial, Tsafendas went down in the history books as a deranged murderer. Harris Dousemetzis exposes one of the great lies in South African history and shows that Tsafendas was an extraordinary man, with deeply held communist and anti-racist politics.

Why Did Women Vote for Hitler? Long-Forgotten Essays Hold Some Answers

Why Did Women Vote for Hitler? Long-Forgotten Essays Hold Some Answers

Dissatisfaction with the attitudes of the Weimar era, the period between the end of World War I and Hitler’s rise to power, is clear in the women’s writing. Most of the essay writers express distaste with some aspect of the political system. One calls women’s voting rights “a disadvantage for Germany,” while another describes the political climate as “haywire,” and “everyone was everyone’s enemy.”

Remembering Attica

Remembering Attica

On the eve of what would become the US’s�most famous prison uprising, the inmates of Attica Correctional Facility in upstate New York endured�deplorable�conditions. Their infections went untreated, their teeth fell out due to negligible dental care — they even lacked adequate access to soap and toilet paper.

On September 9, 1971, these pent-up�grievances simmered over when roughly�1,300 inmates took over the prison. For four days they were effectively in charge. They made demands on�the state (better medical care, fewer limits on their�freedom of expression, immunity from prosecution for rebelling), negotiated with mediators brought in at their behest (including, briefly, Black Panther leader Bobby Seale), and generally asserted their worth as�human beings.

But whatever the prisoners�gained in those few days was quickly pulverized�by the brute force of the state. Seeking dignity, they instead unleashed the wrath of New York governor Nelson Rockefeller.