Open Primaries Have Their Fans. The Parties Are Not Among Them. – The New York Times
Open Primaries Have Their Fans. The Parties Are Not Among Them. – The New York Times
When Louisiana voters cast ballots on Saturday, Senator Bill Cassidy’s political demise could be hastened by a decision his fellow Republicans made two years ago: getting rid of an open, nonpartisan primary in favor of a closed system in which Republicans and Democrats compete separately.
That nonpartisan primary was adopted, in part, to empower politicians like Mr. Cassidy who have been willing to cross party leaders and reach across the aisle. Supporters of open primaries and political scientists who have studied them say they increase voter participation and elect more middle-of-the-road candidates.
Across the country, partisans are turning against such systems. In response, supporters are intensifying their advocacy with an even bigger claim, based on research commissioned by open primary proponents: Open primaries may better people’s quality of life in tangible ways that include increased prosperity, longer lives and lower murder rates.
